Friday, February 4, 2011

Friday, November 19, 2010

A Welcome Change Of Course

A new blog post on the Weather Rangers website by Alberto Feliciano, one of the leaders of the Weather Rangers, included this encouraging change of course:

Is it necessary to totally eliminate Hurricanes?

Probably not.
Many people have expressed concerns about what eliminating natural atmospheric phenomena might do to the planet's natural energies, and there might be something to that.
Maybe only those storms that threaten human lives should be altered a bit, not every single storm out there. Lets keep this in mind while we're working with the weather. There is still much, much to be learned about our Planet.
In the meantime let's also get ready for the People-killing storms. As you can see from the picture I posted today in our photos section, a picture from NOAA Hurricane Center, the season is now open: activity is picking up. August and September are traditionally the two busiest months of the year for Hurricane formation. Let's pray for guidance and do that which is best for all involved.
Alberto
 I note that he does not say who these "many people" might be, but as far as I know, I am the only one to have expressed concern about the appropriateness of preventing hurricanes. And Mr. Feliciano has not replied to any of the numerous e-mails I have sent him on the subject.
On the contrary, he has instead posted a message approving of some personal defamation about me. That might possibly be the reason he is reluctant to identify the source who raised the issues upon which his change of thinking is based.
Possibly someone else has remonstrated with him about the potential risk to the biosphere of interfering with so important a natural phenomena, and possibly he has been convinced by to material I sent him that his former policy of trying to block all hurricane formation was of questionable wisdom. If someone else has managed to get through to him, I would like to know who it was.
But I remain unsatisfied by the depth of his conversion. This recent post, though welcome, still leaves many issues unresolved.
 He still has not mentioned the many ecological considerations I brought up which require no knowledge of orgone energy to understand, and he does not cite the specific orgone energy discovered by Wilhelm Reich, which underlies all weather phenomena and upon which the functioning of the cloudbuster is based, but refers in vague terms to unnamed "natural energies" (plural).
 He still has not mentioned, let alone subscribed to, the all-important concept of Atmospheric Self-Regulation, and he still has not grasped the distinction between a healthy atmosphere and a sick one. It is this concept of the way the atmosphere normally functions and the role of DOR in causing it to malfunction that presents a reliable guideline for when to intervene in a weather situation, not the anthropocentric criteria of if humans are likely to be killed or not.
He refers to "people-killing" storms and suggests that it might be all right to alter those, while leaving other, less dangerous storms alone. I would like to know how he plans to know in advance which storms will take lives and which will not.
I would also ask how is it possible to alter the course of a storm without taking responsibility for the new direction it is deflected into. If you save lives in a coastal zone by directing the storm out to sea, for example, and it then sinks several ships, drowning the people on board those ships, you are then responsible for killing those people, no matter how many lives you might have saved on shore.
The solution is not to distinguish between storms that kill some people and those that do not, since that would be hard to know in advance anyway, but to minimize the damage done by any storm by adopting sensible building codes, reasonable land-use policies and zoning laws that prevent large concentrations of people from congregating in areas that are known to be at periodic risk from storms.
 Such modest measures are less exotic and less gratifying to one who enjoys a sense of power than weather control, but are within the realm of possibility without the risk of wreaking incalcuable harm on the natural enivironment upon which, like it or not, human  life depends.
So I am glad to see Mr. Feliciano is open to changing his mind when he is informed about things he had not previously considered, and I look forward to his further enlightenment.
And, of course, I stand ready to provide him or any other members of the Weather Rangrs with any informatuion they may need to reach a responsible policy on how and when to intervene in the weather.
Joel Carlinsky

Atmospheric Self-Regulation

 
 The areas that many humans live in need hurricanes as much as the areas where no humans live, so diverting hurricanes away from populated areas would still be harming those areas anyway.
 
 Besides, hurricanes cover such a large area and the coastal regions are so built up and thickly populated now that the only place to send a hurricane where it would not hit inhabited places would be out to sea. That would leave the land areas without hurricanes, and the land ecosystems need them as much as the ocean ecosystems do.

 
I am not against all cloudbusting. I am against using cloudbusters to CONTROL weather, and I think anyone who wants to use them to make the weather do what he wants it to is acting in an authoritarian way, regardless of what he thinks his motivation is or how he may rationalize it. The proper use of the cloudbuster is to REMOVE DOR and RE-ESTABLISH ATMOSPHERIC SELF-REGULATION. If that is done, the atmosphere can be trusted to do the right thing, even if the right thing happens not to be what the cloudbuster operator wanted it to do.
 
That is the exact same situation as a parent faces in deciding how to raise a child. The parent should not try to think of how to get the child to choose the careeer the parent wants him to, or the girlfriend the parent wants him to choose. The parent should try to bring up a child to make his own choices and should trust the child to do so properly if the child has been raised to be self-regulating. If the child then chooses a career or a girlfriend the parent does not like, that is still not to say authoritarianism is the best way to bring up children. It is more likely to mean that parents are not as good at making such choices as a child who has been raised to be self-regulating.
 
Just as a person who truly belives in democracy must be willing to allow the people to decide how they want to live, a parent who truly believes in self-regulation must allow a child to make his own choices and a cloudbuster operator who wants to help the atmosphere to be healthy and self-regulating must be williing to stand by and let it do things the operator would rather it did not do.
 
The ability of the atmosphere to pulsate freely and flow freely is the most important thing. If that means some houses get smashed because some fool built them in a place that normally gets hurricanes, the real reason those houses get smashed is not that a hurricane hit them, but that a fool built them in the wrong place.  
 
I would expect someone who wants to control weather would also like to control people. The authoritarian attitude is the same in both cases. Reich wrote about this in the last chapter of Contact With Space and compared the cloudbuster operator who wants to control weather to a dictator and the use of the cloudbuster to help establish atmospheric self-regulation to a guide. This difference between a dictator and a guide is the crucial point I have been trying to make in all my posts about cloudbusting.
 

The Orgonomic and Ecological Function of Hurricanes

                         The Orgonomic and Ecological Function of Hurricanes
                                              By Joel Carlinsky


The conventional view of the intense tropical storms called "hurricanes" is that they are caused by heating of the atmosphere by the sun, and driven by the difference in temperature between the air and sea. They are supposedly directed by corialis forces caused by the spin of the earth. It is all presented in a cut-and-dried manner, as if it were fully settled and there is no other theory.

But in 1951, in his book, Cosmic Superimposition, Wilhelm Reich presented an alternative explanation for hurricanes. He postulated they are caused by the superimposition of two mighty streams of cosmic energy which reach the earth from space, intersecting at the proper angle to create hurricanes and that these streams are what determines the path of the storm.

A few years later, Reich was able to provide incontrovertable experimental evidence for his theory in the form of an invention of his, the cloudbuster, which functions by attracting such energy streams within the atmosphere. This device proved able to divert the course of hurricanes on several occasions. This evidence that such energy streams do in fact exist and control the weather, including the course of hurricanes, would normally have put to rest the "heat-engine" theory in favor of the cosmic energy stream theory. That it did not has more to do with the history and internal politics of the formally organized scientific community than with the physical facts of the natural world with which science is supposed to be concerned.

Nevertheless, those relatively few individuals who have witnessed the functioning of the cloudbuster device are in no doubt about which theory is correct. If the cloudbuster does produce the effects which it has been seen to produce, it follows as a matter of logic that the orgonomic theory of atmospheric functioning must be the correct one since there is no explanation in the conventional theory that could account for such a phenomenon.

But in recent years, as the internet has facilitated communication around the world, millions of people who previously would never have heard of Reich and his theory have learned about the cloudbuster, and many of those people, with scarcely any knowledge of the intricate theory behind it, have constructed cloudbusters and attempted to use them, usually with unwanted side-effects, to affect their local weather systems in various ways.

And, inevitably, there has developed in some quarters the idea that the cloudbuster, being able to influence the path of a hurricane, should be used to "save lives" by weakening hurricanes or steering them away from populated areas. This throughly misguided notion fails to take into account the theory upon which the cloudbuster is based, a theory which renders it immediately obvious that such interference with hurricanes would be a serious mistake with the gravest of environmental consequences.

Reich discovered in the atmosphere a form of energy which under normal conditions is in constant motion. It flows from point to point. It also pulsates as it flows along. Both these normal motions are essential to the normal functioning of the atmosphere. They are also both essential to the biological functioning of all living organisms within the atmosphere.

But sometimes, under certain very specific conditions, most frequently nowadays as a result of the increasing use of nuclear energy, this energetic matrix in which the earth is embedded becomes stagnated. The normally moving energy streams become "stuck" and fail to produce their usual invigorating effects on both atmosphere and organisms. This stagnant condition is what Reich termed "DOR".

DOR is a normal part of the metabolism of the atmospheric energy field, and some DOR has always existed, but in recent times, due largely to human technological activities, especially the use of nuclear power, it has been greatly increasing, to the detriment of both meteorological and biological conditions. This great increase in the stagnation of the atmosphere is what is really behind the changes in climate that are being conventionally attributed to increased heating from so-called "greenhouse gases".

The build-up of DOR is also the most important factor in numerous biological illnesses, unaccountable die-offs of certain species of wildlife, and the dying of forests which is commonly attributed to acidity of rainwater. In fact, the increase in acidity of both rainwater and ocean water is yet another symptom of the stagnant energetic conditions Reich called DOR.

DOR is, in short, the single most important factor underlying a wide range of environmental problems, and the increase in DOR is among the most serious issues facing this planet at this time. The cloudbuster was in fact, invented as a device to re-mobilize the stagnated atmosphere, to drain off DOR and allow the atmosphere to begin moving, flowing, and pulsating normally again. This proper function of the cloudbuster has often been ignored or forgotten in the misinterpretation of it as a means to "control weather".

Normally a strong circulatory storm system such as a tropical hurricane accomplishes the same function, but on a much grander scale. The vast influx of new, fresh energy streaming in from space, flowing along at high speed, pulsating in huge waves, catches up and remobilizes the regions of stale, stuck, stagnant DOR, restoring the atmosphere to vibrant health. This cleansing effect of hurricanes each year is the most important way in which the flow and pulsation of the atmospheric energy is maintained. Upon it, all life depends.

Some Topics For Discussion

                                               Some Topics For Discussion


Can cloudbusting be regulated? Can national governments be trusted to regulate cloudbusting in the public interest? Or would they inevitably give in to the temptation to use it in ways contrary to the public interest?

If national governments cannot be trusted with control of the weather, should some international agency be entrusted with the job? Is an effective international agency possible in the current state of the world, where nation-states are free to do pretty much as they please?

 Is it even possible to control cloudbusting, given the simplicity of the equipment required? What would be required to stop illegal cloudbuster operators from working covertly? Could it be done?

Is government regulation preferable to the current situation of a mass movement of free-lance private individuals doing whatever they want with the weather?

Is it possible to get any sort of government action before obtaining recognition from the scientific community that cloudbusting is possible? Or must any sort of regulatory action wait until the scientific community changes it's paradigm to include orgone energy?


If no government action is possible until official science accepts the fact that the cloudbuster works, and that is not possible unless they first accept that orgone energy exists, which means admitting everything they know in nearly all fields of science is wrong, should the few people who are convinced the cloudbuster does work try to gain official scientific acceptance for the cloudbuster and for the orgone theory in general?

 Or should they keep quiet and let the scientific community continue on the wrong track so there will be no governmental misuse of cloudbusting?

Right now, somewhere around 2,000 people have done some form of cloudbusting at some time or other in the past 58 years. How many would be required to get some form of governmental action started on the issue? 5,000? 10,000? 50,000? 100,000?

How many free-lance cloudbuster operators can the world survive?

If you have any thoughts on any of these questions, please share them with this group.

( You are receiving this message because you have expressed an interest in cloudbusting, orgonomy, or ecology at some time in the past. If you wish to receive more messages on this subject, please join the Orgonomic Ecology group by sending an e-mail to :
    OrgonomicEcology-subscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk )

Making Things Worse

What is happening to the atmosphere is not "global warming" and has nothing to do with "greenhouse gases"; it is oranur/DOR caused by nuclear reactors that is causing the atmospheric orgone energy to go haywire. And none of the geoengineering ideas proposed would have any effect on it. Only cloudbusting could help solve the problem.

But instead of cloudbusting being used rationally to help solve the atmospheric breakdown problem, it is being made worse by backyard hobbyists who find out about cloudbusting from the internet, and blunder around doing crazy things like trying to stop hurricanes and tornadoes instead of doing DOR removal. These untrained, unskilled wildcat operators are compounding the problems and cloudbuster proliferation is rapidly becoming as much a threat as oranur itself.

The atmosphere is already in a bad way because of human technology, and the "volkscloudbuster" movement is making it exponentially worse. It was bad enough with Trevor Constable confusing people deliberately with his smoke and mirrors show, and with DeMeo being incompetent, but then the Croftians came along with their role-playing games and made the whole thing look silly, and now there are these "Weather Rangers" mucking about and trying to interfere with the atmosphere's immune system and keep it from remobilizing DOR.

That is all we need to kill off what is left of the atmospheric energy. The global orgone capacity is down around 35% now from what it was in the early 1940s, before the Atomic Age began, and the biological and meteorological effects are showing up everywhere, and
the very last thing we need is a gang of Weather Monkeys fooling around with no idea what they are doing.

To make things even worse, Jamie Ogg knows perfectly well all about all this, but he is encouraging them in their hubris because he has recently had a falling out with Mary Higgins and her merry crew and is feeling hurt and angry at orgonomy so he wants to promote a rival movement.

With a well-thought-out carefully-done cloudbusting project it might be possible to keep this planet ticking long enough for the Atomic Era to end and the atmosphere might recover. That is what Reich wanted to happen, and what Eva was still wishing for when she died.  But the combination of mass production of oranur and a mass movement of Weather Monkeys is more than it will be able to survive.

Skeptics And Crazies

The argument about water vapor being the most important greenhouse gas was brought up many years ago by Reid Bryson, who was the top climatologist in the country, and from whom I learned some of the things I have expounded on the orgonescience list.

The global warming scare is nothing but PR for the nuclear industry to get the environmentalists to go away and hassle the coal industry for a while.

But you simply cannot say, "ignore the orgonomic facts" and think only within the mechanistic theories. The mechanistic theories are dead wrong, period. The atmosphere functions according to orgonomic findings, and there is no other way to look at it. There IS an atmospheric breakdown underway. And it IS man-made. And it IS serious. Reich wrote about it in the 50s and it has only gotten worse. And now it is bad enough that even people who have no idea of the facts are seeing the effects and reaching for answers.

 Some are crazy enough to think the changes they see in the sky are due to some plot to spray chemicals out of airplanes. Some imagine there is some secret government weather manipulation program using some imaginary electromagnetic technology. Some think it is being caused by invisible shape-shifting reptiles from another universe. But all these lunatics are really seeing the effects of DOR and do not understand what causes it.

Not surprisingly, the crazies are trying to solve the problem within their own paradigms. The chemtrail hobbyists are pestering honest goverment employees with Freedom of Information act requests about non-existent chemical spraying programs and trying to get lawsuits or Congressional investigations going, the Croftians are indulging in their role-playing games of fighting aliens with their toy cloudbusters, and numerous psychics are hard at work setting the weather right with their psychic powers.

 



 The very idea that the weather should be "controlled" by humans to solve the problems of a chaotic atmosphere is based on the misunderstanding of what is happening to it. The whole problem is caused by humans "controlling" it in the first place by building nuclear reactors, which "control" the weather by irritating it into wild fluctuations like droughts and floods.

What is needed is to "uncontrol" it; to help the atmosphere return to the condition it was in before the humans started irritating it. In Reichian terms, to re-establish atmospheric self-regulation. But leave it to the mechanists to blunder onto the scene with a bad solution that, if it actually did work,  would  only make things worse by trying to add yet another layer of artificial intervention to the already serious atmospheric crisis.

But the skeptics, justified as they are, who are debunking the "global warming" hoax, are not helping much either. By denial of the obvious fact that the climate really IS changing, they make it even harder for the voices of those who know there is a problem to be taken seriously. And at the same time, the skeptics also discredit skepticism about global warming by denial of the obvious.

It is like what Freud said when asked how to raise children: "Whatever you do is wrong."

DOR Removal Vs. Weather Control

   DOR Removal Vs. Weather Control
                                                      By Joel Carlinsky

DOR is a reaction of the atmospheric orgone to heavy infestation of Deadly Orgone Radiation (DOR), a term coined  in the mid-twentieth century by Dr. Wilhelm Reich, inventor of the cloudbuster, to refer to a stagnant form of energy that was diametrically opposed to the flowing, pulsating, life-enhancing energy which Reich termed orgone energy."

Orgone movements underlie all atmospheric behavior and DOR, being stagnant and relatively motionless, blocks the free pulsation of the atmosphere and cause droughts. Floods and hyper-strong winds such as tornadoes are a reaction of the remaining motile orgone to cleanse itself and return to normal pulsation.

The cloudbuster can facilitate removal of DOR, thus restoring the atmosphere to life and motion, ending the tendency to drought and other extreme weather.

Unfortunately, the cloudbuster has a side-effect. If used improperly, it can enable the operator to control the weather. Many people are attracted to this prospect. Such attraction is a pathology, no matter how it is rationalized.
 
Anyone who speaks of cloudbusting as "weather engineering" or "weather control" clearly does not understand it. Attempting to control the weather with a cloudbuster is malpractice. Responsible cloudbusting is not about "controling weather". It is about healing a sick atmosphere of the illness caused by human intervention and restoring it to normal so it can regulate itself.
 
Self-regulation of the atmosphere is the goal of all responsible cloudbusting. If there is a problem of atmospheric functioning, the cloudbuster can and should be used to remove the obstacle that is preventing the atmosphere from behaving normally. Interfering with a normally functioning atmosphere to produce an abnormal condition or series of events is only to add to the already nearly fatal malfunctioning of the atmosphere which is being caused by other types of human activities.  
The failure to grasp this essential point is not limitted to cowboy cloudbuster enthusiasts. It is the common attitude toward nearly everything of nearly all humans in this sick culture that nothing in nature should be beyond human control and exploitation. Control of the weather has been a popular dream for centuries and remains so today for many people who have never heard of cloudbusting.
 
 Until the cloudbuster was invented, this dream was harmless, but now, when these people, still suffering from this pathological desire to impose their will on the atmosphere, are able to arm themselves with cloudbusters, it has become a frightening reality that threatens all life on earth.
 
Watermark temp

No comments:

Post a Comment